The end of stiff grades?

Home of Welsford's Cochrane Lane Cliffs.

Moderators: PeterA, chossmonkey, Stacey, Dom, granite_grrl, Greg, Joe

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby theriault » Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:49 pm

Samuel Stiles wrote:These are all just extreme circumstances, and considering a poorly bolted route (AKA a sudden spike in difficulty just before the 2nd bolt).


I think you just answered your own question....
Marty
User avatar
theriault
 
Posts: 542
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:04 am
Location: Oromocto

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby sam » Fri Sep 28, 2012 12:58 pm

theriault wrote:
Samuel Stiles wrote:These are all just extreme circumstances, and considering a poorly bolted route (AKA a sudden spike in difficulty just before the 2nd bolt).


I think you just answered your own question....


The point is, what logic is there behind intentionally misleading people as per the difficulty? As far as I've seen, you guys are saying "to throw climbers a curve-ball!", and that's just not something I see the vast majority of climbers (especially newbies, of which there are a growing number) wanting during their climbs.

I personally don't think "because of the history" qualifies as valid logic in this situation, especially considering they expanded on the grading system for the very purpose of removing the ambiguity of the "+" grades.
Great climbing links:
http://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/ - http://www.reddit.com/r/climbingvids/ - http://www.reddit.com/r/climbingporn/ (that last one isn't what you think it is)
If I'm posting here, I'm probably at work.
User avatar
sam
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:12 am

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby Shawn B » Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:12 pm

theriault wrote:Its to keep an element of adventure, a spice factor. Climbers used to be for hard men with big balls, if you didn't have a good head back then, then you simply didn't climb. Protection has come a long way since then making the sport way more safe,. Guide books are now showing us exactly where the routes starts, a description of it, protection, anchors and sometimes even some key beta.... where is the element of adventure in that?? So its just a simple way to keep some excitement in the sport!


Are ya serious??? Did I read wrong then that you were selling your hexes and tricams? Shouldn't you be selling your cams instead?? :wink:

Some people who sandbag climb at such a level that they seriously have difficulty in telling the difference between grades at a moderate level. Some people are strong at certain types of climbing too and find routes that suit their style to be easier than other people who are strong at a different style. Others who sandbag on purpose (stating it as a joke, prank or to "school" someone) are just trying to inflate their own ego (my 5.8 is everyone else's 5.10) or trying to make up for some other feeling of inadequacy. For fack sake...grade as accurately, objectively and honestly as you can. Climbing is dangerous enough without "teaching someone else a lesson in your greatness". Climbing is not safe. It has been made safER by the advances in gear, guidebooks, online resources, etc. But it is still not SAFE. Not even sport climbing. You're only kidding yourself if you think it is.
Safety third!!!
Shawn B
 
Posts: 439
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:36 pm

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby theriault » Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:19 pm

Shawn B wrote:
theriault wrote:Its to keep an element of adventure, a spice factor. Climbers used to be for hard men with big balls, if you didn't have a good head back then, then you simply didn't climb. Protection has come a long way since then making the sport way more safe,. Guide books are now showing us exactly where the routes starts, a description of it, protection, anchors and sometimes even some key beta.... where is the element of adventure in that?? So its just a simple way to keep some excitement in the sport!


Are ya serious??? Did I read wrong then that you were selling your hexes and tricams? Shouldn't you be selling your cams instead?? :wink:

Some people who sandbag climb at such a level that they seriously have difficulty in telling the difference between grades at a moderate level. Some people are strong at certain types of climbing too and find routes that suit their style to be easier than other people who are strong at a different style. Others who sandbag on purpose (stating it as a joke, prank or to "school" someone) are just trying to inflate their own ego (my 5.8 is everyone else's 5.10) or trying to make up for some other feeling of inadequacy. For fack sake...grade as accurately, objectively and honestly as you can. Climbing is dangerous enough without "teaching someone else a lesson in your greatness". Climbing is not safe. It has been made safER by the advances in gear, guidebooks, online resources, etc. But it is still not SAFE. Not even sport climbing. You're only kidding yourself if you think it is.


Nicely said Shawn,
and eh PS, you signature block does say "Safety third!!!" :wink:
Marty
User avatar
theriault
 
Posts: 542
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:04 am
Location: Oromocto

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby sam » Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:22 pm

Shawn B wrote:grade as accurately, objectively and honestly as you can. Climbing is dangerous enough without "teaching someone else a lesson in your greatness".


In addition, climbing is dangerous enough without "grading something in 2012 as if it were 1965, because... have a history lesson?".
Great climbing links:
http://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/ - http://www.reddit.com/r/climbingvids/ - http://www.reddit.com/r/climbingporn/ (that last one isn't what you think it is)
If I'm posting here, I'm probably at work.
User avatar
sam
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:12 am

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby Shawn B » Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:49 pm

And oh...btw...waterfall layback was originally graded 5.8...not 5.9. And boulevard 5.3 by the same folks.
Safety third!!!
Shawn B
 
Posts: 439
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:36 pm

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby theriault » Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:53 pm

Shawn B wrote:And oh...btw...waterfall layback was originally graded 5.8...not 5.9.


I have a copy of the original guidebook (C. Bell 1978?) and yeah its not only 5.8 but the only 5.8 and hardest route in CL!!! pretty cool!
Marty
User avatar
theriault
 
Posts: 542
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:04 am
Location: Oromocto

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby Leehammer » Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:44 am

Hey Marty, if I was going to assign a grade to how hard it is to follow your logic, I would say it's about a 6 (but it's actually a 9)
User avatar
Leehammer
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:15 am

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby theriault » Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:40 am

Leehammer wrote:Hey Marty, if I was going to assign a grade to how hard it is to follow your logic, I would say it's about a 6 (but it's actually a 9)


Don't worry, I have the same problem sometimes! HAHA I'm way better at campfire debates than online crap :mrgreen:
Marty
User avatar
theriault
 
Posts: 542
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:04 am
Location: Oromocto

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby Nihoa » Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:22 pm

Sandbagging sorta seems like teabagging.
User avatar
Nihoa
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:25 pm
Location: Freddy NB

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby breau » Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:28 pm

Isn't sandbagging a little like drawing a map wrong? Mostly, it's funny for people who didn't really need a map in the first place.
User avatar
breau
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:29 pm

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby gwa » Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:52 pm

Hmmm, I've noticed in my travels that climbers love to call their home crag sandbagged. I've been guilty of it too.

Hope you're still enjoying some warm rock in NB. It's a bit nippy out here in the Chossies.

Cheers!

Graham
Graham
User avatar
gwa
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Southern New Brew

Re: The end of stiff grades?

Postby sam » Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:46 pm

breau wrote:Isn't sandbagging a little like drawing a map wrong? Mostly, it's funny for people who didn't really need a map in the first place.


LOL very well put, brilliant
Great climbing links:
http://www.reddit.com/r/climbing/ - http://www.reddit.com/r/climbingvids/ - http://www.reddit.com/r/climbingporn/ (that last one isn't what you think it is)
If I'm posting here, I'm probably at work.
User avatar
sam
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:12 am

Previous

Return to New Brunswick

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests

cron