New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Home of Welsford's Cochrane Lane Cliffs.

Moderators: PeterA, chossmonkey, Stacey, Dom, granite_grrl, Greg, Joe

New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Fred » Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:44 pm

Thanks to hard work by Greg Hughes and Stacey Couturier, NB climbers have another new crag to enjoy.

Check out http://www.beta-source.com for downloadable PDF mini-guide of Kingston Cliff. Guide by Greg Hughes.
I want to go to hell... there's probably lots of rock to climb there.
User avatar
Fred
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3140
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:30 am
Location: Fredericton, NB

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Adam » Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:01 am

looking forward to checking it out!
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:39 pm

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby cory » Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:34 pm

It's nice. They put a LOT of work into it.
User avatar
cory
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:07 pm
Location: SJ

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Dom » Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:20 pm

cory wrote:It's nice.


I agree. The rock seems to be the same type as in Hampton BUT it is much more solid. Furthermore, It might be possible to climb there in November because the sun hits the cliffs first thing in the morning so it warms up the rock a lot!!

good job Greg and Stacey!
So much rock, so little time
User avatar
Dom
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:28 pm
Location: Oromocto West

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby john » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:55 pm

I am excited to see this area, it has been 11 years since I first visited it looking for routes. I recall at the time finding a red rap sling near the right/central end of the cliff I remember thinking it was Joe's, not sure if it was.

What does the red color mean in the new topo?
john
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:08 am
Location: Fred. NB

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby gwa » Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:09 pm

Wow!
I was in the Kingston area today and stopped to check out the new crag...

Thanks all of you who helped develop this crag, especially Greg and Stacy.

I can't wait to climb there! Looking forward to some sunny sport climbing.
Graham
User avatar
gwa
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:08 pm
Location: Southern New Brew

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Stacey » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:31 pm

gwa wrote:Wow!
I was in the Kingston area today and stopped to check out the new crag...

Thanks all of you who helped develop this crag, especially Greg and Stacy.

I can't wait to climb there! Looking forward to some sunny sport climbing.


it's quite warm there when it's sunny - - will be a great November spot (I hope)
Stace
''When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.''
~John Muir
User avatar
Stacey
 
Posts: 497
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:57 am
Location: dreaming of the mountains...

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Leehammer » Sat Nov 21, 2009 7:57 pm

We had a great day at this new crag today. Thanks for all the work developing it!
User avatar
Leehammer
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:15 am

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Leehammer » Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:46 am

For anyone who cares, I think that some of the grades are a little high at this crag.

I would say:
Awestruck - 5.6
Jester - 5.10d
Another Drumstick - 5.10a
Odysseus - 5.7
Medusa - 5.5 (awesome route!)

Jester is a tough one to grade... I was tall enough to hit the jug to the right of the second bolt while standing on the top of the big block at the bottom, which makes the bottom a lot easier. I could see that if you weren't tall enough to reach it, it could be a lot harder, there aren't a lot of good feet in between.

We also passed by the boulder, holy crap that thing is high! There could be some seriously hard high problems there!

Thanks again to Greg and Stacy...
User avatar
Leehammer
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:15 am

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby *Chris* » Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:38 am

Ptfff... I totally climbed all of these lines years ago and never bothered to document them. At the time I graded them all as 4th class scrambles... maybe a 5.1 in there somewhere. All bolts should be removed since I'm sure I saw an intermittent crack somewhere at that crag. :roll:

Kidding... can't wait to get there sometime!
User avatar
*Chris*
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: Fredericton

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Greg » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:44 pm

Leehammer wrote:For anyone who cares, I think that some of the grades are a little high at this crag.

I would say:
Awestruck - 5.6
Jester - 5.10d
Another Drumstick - 5.10a
Odysseus - 5.7
Medusa - 5.5 (awesome route!)

Jester is a tough one to grade... I was tall enough to hit the jug to the right of the second bolt while standing on the top of the big block at the bottom, which makes the bottom a lot easier. I could see that if you weren't tall enough to reach it, it could be a lot harder, there aren't a lot of good feet in between.

We also passed by the boulder, holy crap that thing is high! There could be some seriously hard high problems there!

Thanks again to Greg and Stacy...

I would agree with your thoughts on the grade for Medusa as it is very easy climbing albeit for the first 15 feet. There is maybe one 5.7 move down low but according to YDS that's how it should be graded (on the hardest move). That is the one route that most folks think is a little soft, however, the others have all been confirmed. Maybe your grading is off because of climbing too many old school CL routes like Whiter Shade of Pale :wink: a 5.6 that would be an 8 or 9 today.

Most folks who have climbed Jester grade it at 11 b/c.

Yeah the bouldering wall is really a short cliff (25 feet?) with some interesting looking stuff. I am going to try and bolt a line or two there this winter and leave them up for grabs as they will likely be beyond me. The walk to that cliff from the parking spot (abandoned driveway) is very short.

Thanks for you thoughts and kind words. I am glad you liked it.
Greg
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:57 pm
Location: Kingston, NB

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Greg » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:45 pm

*Chris* wrote:Ptfff... I totally climbed all of these lines years ago and never bothered to document them. At the time I graded them all as 4th class scrambles... maybe a 5.1 in there somewhere. All bolts should be removed since I'm sure I saw an intermittent crack somewhere at that crag. :roll:
[/i] [/size]



:lol: :lol:
Greg
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:57 pm
Location: Kingston, NB

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Leehammer » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:10 pm

Greg H wrote:Most folks who have climbed Jester grade it at 11 b/c.


Has anyone else climbed it who is over 5' 8" or so? I think height makes a huge difference on the bottom section. That's part of what makes grading routes impossible...
User avatar
Leehammer
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:15 am

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby david » Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:19 pm

I would agree with Liam on Jester and most others. I was able to reach the jugs on the right without having to move my feet up pulling on the mono. The top part actually felt harder than the bottom to me. I also finished that route much faster (few tries) than other 11c's that I usually have to project for months.

I really enjoyed medusa and Err to the throne/French connection

Good work and many thanks
david
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:58 am

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Dom » Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:17 pm

[quote="david"]I would agree with Liam on Jester and most others. I was able to reach the jugs on the right without having to move my feet up pulling on the mono. The top part actually felt harder than the bottom to me. I also finished that route much faster (few tries) than other 11c's that I usually have to project for months.

Then height definitely makes a difference... I thought the bottom crux went around 5.11a/b and I thought the top crux was 5.10c max...

I'm 5'9 and I definitely had to pull on the mono on the FFA onsight. Maybe you guys found new beta hehe
So much rock, so little time
User avatar
Dom
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:28 pm
Location: Oromocto West

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Greg » Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:50 pm

Dombackpacker wrote:I would agree with Liam on Jester and most others. I was able to reach the jugs on the right without having to move my feet up pulling on the mono. The top part actually felt harder than the bottom to me. I also finished that route much faster (few tries) than other 11c's that I usually have to project for months.

Then height definitely makes a difference... I thought the bottom crux went around 5.11a/b and I thought the top crux was 5.10c max...

I'm 5'9 and I definitely had to pull on the mono on the FFA onsight. Maybe you guys found new beta hehe


The sentences in bold seem to conflict with each other :?
Greg
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:57 pm
Location: Kingston, NB

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Greg » Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:52 pm

Dombackpacker wrote:
david wrote:I would agree with Liam on Jester and most others. I was able to reach the jugs on the right without having to move my feet up pulling on the mono. The top part actually felt harder than the bottom to me. I also finished that route much faster (few tries) than other 11c's that I usually have to project for months.

Then height definitely makes a difference... I thought the bottom crux went around 5.11a/b and I thought the top crux was 5.10c max...

I'm 5'9 and I definitely had to pull on the mono on the FFA onsight. Maybe you guys found new beta hehe


The original intention of this line was to go straight up the face below the tuning fork spruce. Did you guys get off route to the right of the bolts? It is certainly easier that way. I would not agree that up the face is 5.10 climbing.
Greg
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:57 pm
Location: Kingston, NB

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Dom » Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:08 pm

Greg you misinterpreted what I wrote... I tryed to quote David saying he felt the top crux was harder and I failed and then I wrote that I felt that the bottom crux was harder(5.11a/b) for me.

maybe these guys are each 6'2 or maybe they went a little too much to the right because the face can't be 5.10 I agree
So much rock, so little time
User avatar
Dom
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:28 pm
Location: Oromocto West

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby david » Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:48 pm

Yeah maybe that's the difference. We used the bigger holds that are about 2-2.5 feet to the right of the second bolt (slightly above the bolt), but that's as far right as we went. Without these, I can definitely see it being much much harder. Both of us being 6' might also contribute to the differences.

All that said, the route is a lot of fun
david
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:58 am

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby martha » Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:34 am

Leehammer wrote:
Has anyone else climbed it who is over 5' 8" or so? I think height makes a huge difference on the bottom section. That's part of what makes grading routes impossible...


no matter how short, (or how many times I complain about it - LOL) There is always a way through a route and rarely is there more than a letter grade in difficulty. Having seconded Fred who has an Ape Index of +4 giving him a reach of 6'4" and me... who has an Ape index of Zero or less giving me an reach of 5'4", I have always managed to get up routes and on all the routes we've graded together we have pretty well thought to be the same.
The phrase "working mother" is redundant. ~Jane Sellman

If a husband speaks in the woods, and his wife is not there to hear him...is he still wrong?
martha
 
Posts: 2105
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:40 am
Location: planning the next climbing trip....

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Leehammer » Thu Nov 26, 2009 8:55 am

Greg H wrote:
The original intention of this line was to go straight up the face below the tuning fork spruce. Did you guys get off route to the right of the bolts? It is certainly easier that way. I would not agree that up the face is 5.10 climbing.


I looked at this for a while before I got on the route... so I think this probably accounts for the difference in grade, not the height thing.
I had my left hand on the face my right hand on the big jug to the right of the second bolt, and was able to very comfortably clip the bolt from that position. To climb just the face you would have to avoid that jug which is easily within arm's reach.

Greg H wrote:I would agree with your thoughts on the grade for Medusa as it is very easy climbing albeit for the first 15 feet. There is maybe one 5.7 move down low but according to YDS that's how it should be graded (on the hardest move). That is the one route that most folks think is a little soft, however, the others have all been confirmed. Maybe your grading is off because of climbing too many old school CL routes like Whiter Shade of Pale :wink: a 5.6 that would be an 8 or 9 today.


I agree with your logic, but I still think that the crux on the bottom is quite a lot easier than the crux on any 5.7 climb in NB that I have climbed. For example: Snakepeel, superstar, Aventure Pedestre, Miss Conception, to name a few.
User avatar
Leehammer
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:15 am

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Leehammer » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:12 pm

Leehammer wrote:I agree with your logic, but I still think that the crux on the bottom is quite a lot easier than the crux on any 5.7 climb in NB that I have climbed. For example: Snakepeel, superstar, Aventure Pedestre, Miss Conception, to name a few.


Obviously this is only my opinion. Feel free to completely disregard it :)
User avatar
Leehammer
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:15 am

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Dom » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:30 pm

Leehammer wrote:I had my left hand on the face my right hand on the big jug to the right of the second bolt, and was able to very comfortably clip the bolt from that position.


If you could clip from your stance then you were not off route... I guess you just had good beta :mrgreen:

martha wrote:no matter how short, (or how many times I complain about it - LOL) There is always a way through a route and rarely is there more than a letter grade in difficulty.


The crux on this route is a one move wonder so if you can totally skip that move then the grade will be considerably easier than a letter grade.
So much rock, so little time
User avatar
Dom
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:28 pm
Location: Oromocto West

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Greg » Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:23 pm

Leehammer wrote:
Greg H wrote:
The original intention of this line was to go straight up the face below the tuning fork spruce. Did you guys get off route to the right of the bolts? It is certainly easier that way. I would not agree that up the face is 5.10 climbing.


I looked at this for a while before I got on the route... so I think this probably accounts for the difference in grade, not the height thing.
I had my left hand on the face my right hand on the big jug to the right of the second bolt, and was able to very comfortably clip the bolt from that position. To climb just the face you would have to avoid that jug which is easily within arm's reach.

Greg H wrote:I would agree with your thoughts on the grade for Medusa as it is very easy climbing albeit for the first 15 feet. There is maybe one 5.7 move down low but according to YDS that's how it should be graded (on the hardest move). That is the one route that most folks think is a little soft, however, the others have all been confirmed. Maybe your grading is off because of climbing too many old school CL routes like Whiter Shade of Pale :wink: a 5.6 that would be an 8 or 9 today.


I agree with your logic, but I still think that the crux on the bottom is quite a lot easier than the crux on any 5.7 climb in NB that I have climbed. For example: Snakepeel, superstar, Aventure Pedestre, Miss Conception, to name a few.


When compared to those routes I think you are quite right. The grade on Medusa probably is a little soft. Cory Goodman thought it was 5.5 or 5.6.

Did you try the two routes on the left face of Medusa? They are unbolted tr's. The one up the middle of the face is likely the hardest route there.
Greg
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:57 pm
Location: Kingston, NB

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Greg » Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:26 pm

Dombackpacker wrote:Greg you misinterpreted what I wrote... I tryed to quote David saying he felt the top crux was harder and I failed and then I wrote that I felt that the bottom crux was harder(5.11a/b) for me.


Gotcha.
Greg
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:57 pm
Location: Kingston, NB

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Adam » Thu Nov 26, 2009 3:48 pm

Dombackpacker wrote:Greg you misinterpreted what I wrote... I tryed to quote David


quote fail!
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:39 pm

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Dom » Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:17 pm

Adam wrote:
Dombackpacker wrote:Greg you misinterpreted what I wrote... I tryed to quote David


quote fail!


indeed :oops:

Hey how did you change your nickname from Trad_reborn to Adam...I tryed to change mine the other day but I also failed on that.
So much rock, so little time
User avatar
Dom
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:28 pm
Location: Oromocto West

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Adam » Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:35 pm

Dombackpacker wrote:
Adam wrote:
Dombackpacker wrote:Greg you misinterpreted what I wrote... I tryed to quote David


quote fail!


indeed :oops:

Hey how did you change your nickname from Trad_reborn to Adam...I tryed to change mine the other day but I also failed on that.


hacked the system.
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:39 pm

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Leehammer » Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:56 pm

maybe you can change your picture too. :wink:
User avatar
Leehammer
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:15 am

Re: New Mini-Guide - Kingston Cliff

Postby Fred » Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:22 pm

Great day in Kingston. Had lots of fun on these new routes. Kudos to the hard work you put in Greg and Stacey.

Grades were all pretty close. Some soft... some easy... It's the way she goes. I have yet to climb at a cliff that doesn't have ego boosters and crushers side by each.

Remember that route on Dog Wall in RR Greg? Jon C? LOL 5.10 impossible I think it was graded.

Nice work kids!!
I want to go to hell... there's probably lots of rock to climb there.
User avatar
Fred
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3140
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:30 am
Location: Fredericton, NB

Next

Return to New Brunswick

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests